Press Release

Our policies relevant to this proposal include:
 
All Australians deserve to have full autonomy over their health, and access to resources that promote vitality and good health. We will assist this by:
  1. Supporting lifestyle choices that build and maintain a strong immune system; for example, increasing consumption of organic food.
  2. Increasing educational programs that promote the benefits of healthy living, life skills, eating nutrient-dense food and participating in small-scale food production.
We recognise the importance of transparency in all areas of Government. We will help to boost transparency, giving you greater peace of mind, by:
  1. Calling for Government truth and transparency in all decisions, including disclosure of ALL conflicts of interest. Such information should be easily accessible to the public. 
  2. Assisting consumers to understand what they are ingesting by clearly labeling all human and animal food with any GMO, irradiated and synthetic ingredients.
  3. Calling for independent safety studies in all emerging technologies including, but not limited to, 5G and geoengineering to determine if there are any negative environmental and/or health impacts which could be attributed to these technologies.
 
Your submission
 
We object to Proposal P1055 in its entirety for the following key reasons:
 
  1. It infringes consumer right to informed choice about the ingredients and processes used for the creation and sale of ‘food’.  Our members wish to be aware of all variations of genetic engineering involved in the production of food, even if it concerns genetic engineering processes in the food supply process.
  2. It is clear from proposal P1055 that foods made using NBTs will be ultra-processed and highly refined.  Ultra Processed Foods have been scientifically linked to eight out of ten chronic diseases including obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, as well as increased risk for mortality. Many Ultra Processed Food Ingredients are triggers for allergies and illness and disease.  We are concerned that NBT foods will be even more harmful to health than UPF already are.  Not testing the safety of NBT food products, ingredients and processes involved in the production for compatibility with human biology and long term health, poses a risk to Public Health.
  3. The validity of Proposal P1055 is resting on the conclusion of ‘low risk’ based on the key assumption in the safety assessment by FSANZ that NBT foods can be considered as the same low risk as conventional foods.   Within the narrow scope of ‘safety’ in the Act this may be a legally correct statement, however within the real context of the protection of the standard of public health this is a false equivalence, like saying an apple is the same as an orange because they are both fruits and grow on a tree.     A comparison of a narrow scope of not clearly defined characteristics does not tell the whole story.  As a result of the narrow scope, the actual public health outcomes and the epidemic of chronic disease relating in part to food have been completely ignored in this safety analysis by FSANZ.
Under the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991, FSANZ must ensure a high standard of public health protection throughout Australia and New Zealand and maintain a high degree of consumer confidence.  
 
We trust you are aware of the state of Public Health in Australia and New Zealand.  In Australia, 2022 [ABS 2023]:
  • Eight in ten (81.4%) people had at least one long-term health condition
  • One in two (49.9%) people had at least one chronic condition
  • Mental and behavioural conditions (26.1%), back problems (15.7%), and arthritis (14.5%) were the most common chronic conditions.
Overweight and obesity are key contributors to this chronic disease epidemic, which in all fairness started with the introduction of processed and mass-produced foods in the 20th century. The good news is that overweight and obesity are reversible, with a healthy diet, physical activity and other beneficial lifestyle activities.  With regards to diet, the strongest scientific evidence to reduce the risk of chronic disease is for a Mediterranean style diet, rich in fresh vegetables, fruits, wholegrains, pulses, seeds, nuts, seafood, and some animal food and minimally processed foods like butter and cheese. Therefore, from a Public Health and food health and safety regulation perspective, would it not make sense to move regulation more towards supporting these types of food, good for individual and public health? 
 
Please note that Ultra Processed Foods in the scientific literature are mostly associated with increased risk of disease and mortality and harm to human health.
 
  1. Comprehensive analysis of 45 meta-analyses found consistent evidence linking ultra-processed foods to increased risks of conditions like cancer, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and early death. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ultra-processed-food-health-issues-cancer-early-death-research/  . https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj-2023-078476
  2. A review of studies involving nearly 10 million people found strong links between UPF consumption and increased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, anxiety, depression, and type 2 diabetes. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/28/health/ultraprocessed-food-health-risks-study-wellness/index.html
  3. Harvard study identifies processed meats, sugary breakfast foods and sweetened beverages as the ultra-processed foods most strongly associated with mortality risk. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/ultra-processed-foods-some-more-than-others-linked-to-early-death/
  4. Australian study finds significant association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity, and findings support the potential role of UFP in contributing to obesity in Australia.  Ultra-processed food consumption and obesity in the Australian adult population | Nutrition & Diabetes
  5. Ultra-Processed Foods linked to 10% higher mortality risk in older adults. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/eating-ultra-processed-foods-may-raise-risk-death-10
 
We therefore urge you to withdraw this proposal P1055, and allow for more time for a public debate on this important matter, as well as review if the current Food Act is still ‘fit for purpose’ considering its key objective to ensure a high standard of public health protection in Australia and New Zealand.  
 
Yours sincerely,
Michael O’Neill 
President | HEART Party
 
Other resources:
Previous HEART Party Press Release: Synthetic Food Transformation
Make Australia Healthy Again Substack: Keep it REAL, Stop Ultra Processed syn-bio-tech foods.
HEART-V-Primary-Web-RGB-without-URL.png

Join our Party

Authorised by M. O'Neill, Health Environment Accountability Rights Transparency (HEART) Party, Nulla Nulla Creek Rd, Bellbrook NSW 2440
© 2024 HEART Party |  Built by revealer.org.au
{{ item.message }}